BCES

Section 05 · Principle III

Everyday cycling.

Cycling is not only transport. When there is room to ride together, chat, carry children or groceries, the bicycle becomes part of daily social life.

Photograph · illustrative example, not a representative sampleCopenhagen Fashion Week street-style photograph featuring cyclingN. Quenum / Vogue (2015), figure 1

In Copenhagen, 75% of residents believe cycling culture contributes positively to urban life. Cargo-bicycle and e-bicycle numbers both doubled between 2020 and 2022 (City of Copenhagen, 2022).

The authors describe cycling together to university, dinner and social events. Copenhagen’s PLUSnet routes accommodate a parent and child side by side while another cyclist overtakes (City of Copenhagen, 2024). Berlin’s proposed adaptation prioritises sufficiently wide routes near universities, nightlife districts and other high-demand destinations.

Interactive · conceptual scenarios

How width shapes social cycling

Proposed redesign

Conceptual top-down scenarios, not to scale and not engineering designs. Arrows show travel direction. Green riders travel together and the terracotta rider passes. No precise width thresholds are claimed.

Generous · what changes

Copenhagen's PLUSnet idea supports a parent and child alongside another rider passing. A Berlin adaptation could offer that possibility without guaranteeing it. Actual dimensions, safe clearances, bicycle sizes, volumes and junctions all need assessment.

Potential capabilities in these scenarios
BehaviourNarrowWiderGenerous
Ride side-by-sideNo*LimitedYes*
OvertakeLimitedLimitedYes*
Accommodate cargo bikesLimitedLimitedYes*

* Yes = possible with adequate dimensions, clearances and suitable conditions, not guaranteed. No = not accommodated by this narrow conceptual arrangement, not a universal threshold. Limited cargo accommodation concerns clearance and manoeuvring, not an assertion that cargo biking is impossible.

Theoretical interpretation

Usable width shapes possible rider behaviours, which in turn shape potential experienced value. Riding together could support social and emotional value (Boztepe, 2007) and enjoyment (Schwartz, 2012: hedonism). Room for diverse bicycles could support inclusion. These are potential mechanisms, not empirical proof. Berlin's parking, deliveries, pedestrian needs and limited street space constrain adaptation. Safety, affordability, destinations and personal preferences also shape participation.

Reference: City of Copenhagen (2024), PLUSnet concept. These code-based schematics are new conceptual explanations, not original source figures.

Shared culture

A Berlin cycling etiquette

Proposed redesign

The sign below is a student proposal. Figure 25 digitally places it in a Berlin street photograph. It does not document an installed sign.

Figure 25 · Concept photomontage · not installedBCES concept visualization: Making cycling etiquette visible in Berlin.Original street photograph: GB infraVelo GmbH (n.d.), Beusselstraße. Sign design and photomontage: Paula Klinnert & Malin Zeitter (2026).
Figure 26 · Original proposed designProposed cycling etiquette sign: Signalling, keeping right and overtaking.Original design by Paula Klinnert & Malin Zeitter (2026).
Theoretical interpretation

Clearly communicated etiquette could make riders’ intentions easier to anticipate and could support safer interactions. Through Schwartz’s (2012) framework, visible, learnable norms could address conservation through security (greater predictability) and conformity (shared expectations of considerate behaviour). This is a theoretical rationale, not evidence that the proposed signage reduces accidents.

1Look behind before overtaking2Keep right3Use hand signals when stopping or turning

Copenhagen’s Safe Cycling City campaign promotes these habits. Around half of respondents reported greater awareness (City of Copenhagen, 2022). Berlin could adapt it through hand-signal education in schools, short visual onboarding for Jelbi users, and consistent signs and markings.

More than the individual commuter

Sufficient lane widths, dedicated parking and shared-mobility options should accommodate cargo bicycles and e-bicycles. This could broaden cycling’s appeal to families, shoppers, longer-distance riders and people with different physical abilities.

Current vs. proposed

Theoretical lens

The cited theory

Schwartz identifies universal motivational values, such as security, benevolence, hedonism and self-direction, arranged in a circular structure of compatible and conflicting goals.

Theoretical interpretation

BCES could address security through protection, self-direction through mobility choices, and hedonism through enjoyment. Security and conformity belong to conservation, self-direction belongs to openness to change, and hedonism spans openness and self-enhancement. Shared norms can conflict with autonomy. Changing a cycling habit does not by itself demonstrate openness-to-change motivation.

Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).

The cited theory

Optional and social activities happen only when the physical quality of a place is good enough.

Theoretical interpretation

Generous widths support social journeys while cycling remains an everyday mode of transport.

Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for People. Island Press.

Analysis · mechanisms and reservations

Explore the design logic

Theoretical interpretationProposed redesign

Source-grounded mechanisms, potential value and reservations. The proposed Warschauer Straße evaluation is not measured BCES evidence. Cross-level benefits require coordination and may conflict.

← Previous · 04

Remove Friction

Next · 06 →

Value Creation